 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
Tourism, Culture, Heritage, Sport and Consumer Protection |
 |
AICAC File No. |
Date of Hearing |
Date of Decision |
|
| AC-02-82 | 2005/05/25 & 2006/10/25 | 2006/12/28 | 1. Whether Appellant incapable of returning to full-time employment as of December 17th, 2001, and therefore entitled to ongoing Income Replacement Indemnity benefits. 2. Adequacy of permanent impairment award (10%) for organic brain syndrome. 3. Entitlement to permanent impairment benefits for loss of lumbar spine range of motion. |
| AC-04-144 | 2006/10/31 | 2006/12/22 | Entitlement to funding for physiotherapy and acupuncture |
| AC-04-93 | 2006/12/05 | 2006/12/18 | 1. Entitlement to payment for pain and suffering, lost wages for parents, reimbursement for victim’s personal belongings and education and travel expenses for the family; 2. Entitlement to greater non-dependent Lump Sum Indemnity payment; and 3. Entitlement to greater coverage for funeral expenses. |
| AC-06-111 | 2006/11/30 | 2006/12/18 | Entitlement to Income Replacement Indemnity benefits prior to May 18, 2006 |
| AC-05-113 | 2006/10/12 | 2006/12/15 | Whether the rate of pay provided by MPIC to the Appellant in respect of the personal services rendered by the Appellant’s wife to the Appellant are contrary to The Human Rights Code on the grounds of family status |
| AC-05-183 | 2006/11/27 | 2006/12/12 | Entitlement to coverage for further chiropractic treatment benefits |
| AC-04-158 | 2006/10/03, 2006/10/04 & 2006/10/05 | 2006/12/08 | Entitlement to Income Replacement Indemnity benefits beyond July 1, 2002 |
| AC-06-43 | 2006/11/23 | 2006/12/07 | Entitlement to further permanent impairment benefits |
| AC-05-181 | 2006/11/16 | 2006/12/07 | Entitlement to further chiropractic treatments |
| AC-04-205 | 2006/06/27 | 2006/12/05 | 1. Entitlement to reimbursement of the cost of medications; 2. Entitlement to Income Replacement Indemnity benefits beyond November 30, 2004. |
| AC-03-86 | 2006/07/11, 2006/07/12 & 2006/09/11 | 2006/11/30 | Termination of the Appellant’s Income Replacement Indemnity benefits in January 2006 |
| AC-03-137 | 2006/11/15 | 2006/11/23 | Permanent Impairment Award for damage sustained to tooth #25 |
| AC-04-04 | 2005/08/05 & 2006/10/30 | 2006/11/21 | Entitlement to funding for prescription Androgel Testosterone |
| AC-05-186 | 2006/10/11 | 2006/10/30 | Entitlement to further permanent impairment benefits |
| AC-05-148 | 2006/10/04 | 2006/10/17 | Extension of time to file Notice of Appeal |
| AC-06-21 | 2006/09/13 | 2006/10/12 | 1. Entitlement to Income Replacement Indemnity benefits;
and 2. Entitlement to funding for acupuncture treatments. |
| AC-05-113 | 2006/04/03 & 2006/08/17 | 2006/10/11 | Entitlement to funding and/or reimbursement for: |
| AC-99-158 | 2006/09/13 | 2006/10/11 | 1. Entitlement to permanent impairment benefits for concussion; 2. Entitlement to chiropractic treatment benefits beyond March 1, 2000. |
| AC-05-80 | 2006/06/13 | 2006/09/25 | 1. Entitlement to psychotherapy treatment benefits; and 2. Entitlement to funding for additional pain management therapy, occupational therapy and physiotherapy. |
| AC-05-47 | 2006/09/06 | 2006/09/16 | Whether Appellant’s ongoing disability related to motor vehicle accident of January 26, 2001 |
| AC-05-14 | 2006/08/11 | 2006/08/24 | Termination of chiropractic treatments |
| AC-05-16 | 2006/03/26 & 2006/06/20 | 2006/07/24 | Whether Income Replacement Indemnity benefits were properly reduced to $534.08 bi-weekly effective October 19, 2004. |
| AC-04-20 | 2006/05/03, 2006/05/04, 2006/06/20, 2006/06/22& 2006/06/29, | 2006/07/18 | Entitlement to Income Replacement Indemnity (‘IRI’) benefits beyond June 12, 2004 |
| AC-04-104 | 2004/09/14, 2006/02/06, 2006/05/05 & 2006/06/08 | 2006/07/14 | Discontinuance of Appeal |
| AC-04-162 | 2005/07/11 & 2006/05/18 | 2006/06/27 | Entitlement to further Income Replacement Indemnity benefits |
| AC-05-198 | 2006/06/13 | 2006/06/22 | Entitlement to Physiotherapy Benefits |
| AC-04-54 | 2006/05/11 | 2006/06/22 | 1. Was MPIC correct in determining the Appellant’s
entitlement to Income Replacement Indemnity benefits from
08 Jun 02 in accordance with the relapse Sections of the
MPIC Act (S. 117(1)(a) and 117(3); 2. Was the determination of the Appellant as a “Clerk” proper; 3. Whether the Appellant is able to perform the duties of the determined employment; 4. Was the determined employment income proper; 5. Was Income Replacement Indemnity benefits properly terminated as of 02 Mar 03. |
| AC-04-62 | 2006/05/25 | 2006/06/07 | 1. Entitlement to further Income Replacement Indemnity
benefits; 2. Entitlement to alternative vocational training. |
| AC-05-158 | 2005/12/07 & 2006/05/16 | 2006/06/06 | Entitlement to Income Replacement Indemnity benefits beyond December 5, 2004 |
| AC-04-177-FF | 2006/04/20 | 2005/05/30 | Whether the medical information produced since the Appeal Commission last dealt with the Appellant’s claim provides new information capable of founding a fresh decision. |
| AC-05-125 | 2006/04/26 | 2006/05/10 | Whether the Appellant has provided a reasonable excuse for failing to file her Notice of Appeal within the statutory 90- day time limit |
| AC-05-04 | 2006/11/15 | 2006/05/03 | 1. Whether the Medical Reports listed at page 2 of the Internal Review Office decision October 29, 2004, constitute new information as required by Section 171(1) of The Manitoba Public Insurance Corporation Act. 2. Whether the Appellant is entitled to a Permanent Impairment award pursuant to Section 127 of The Manitoba Public Insurance Corporation Act. |
| AC-04-133 | 2006/04/04 | 2006/05/02 | 1. Did the Appellant provide a reasonable excuse for failing
to apply for a review of the case manager’s decision dated
September 29, 2003 within the sixty (60) day time period. 2. Is the Appellant entitled to Income Replacement Indemnity benefits for September 3, 2003 and September 5, 2003. |
| AC-05-185 | 2006/03/23 | 2006/04/03 | Entitlement to further chiropractic treatment benefits |
| AC-04-155 | 2006/02/28 | 2006/03/29 | Was the Appellant a dependant of the late Joseph Robert Dupuis as defined by Section 70(1) of The Manitoba Public Insurance Corporation Act (‘MPIC Act’) and therefore entitled to benefits set out in Sections 119 to 125 of the MPIC Act? |
| AC-05-91 | 2006/01/12 | 2006/02/28 | Entitlement to Income Replacement Indemnity benefits |
| AC-03-100 | 2005/10/27, 2005/10/28 & 2005/10/31 | 2006/02/22 | 1. Entitlement to further Income Replacement Indemnity
Benefits after March 10, 2002. 2. Reimbursement of expenses after February 26, 2002, including personal care assistance benefits, treatment benefits, dental benefits, travel benefits, and medication. |
| AC-01-04 | 2005/11/07, 2005/11/08 & 2005/11/09 | 2006/02/22 | 1. Whether the entitlement of the Appellant to an Income
Replacement Indemnity (“IRI”) ended when he was
sworn in as a [text deleted]. 2. Whether the Appellant is entitled to a contribution pursuant to Section 138 of The Manitoba Public Insurance Corporation Act, R.S.M. 1987, c. P215 (the “Act”) toward the costs of his attendant care. 3. Whether the Appellant is entitled pursuant to Section 138 of the Act to reimbursement for the following expenses: (a) the purchase and modification of a second motor vehicle for his use while in [text deleted]; (b) the purchase of a second specialized mattress for his residence in [text deleted]; (c) the renovation of an [text deleted] residence to make it wheelchair accessible; (d) a subsidy to enable him to rent or purchase a three-bedroom residence in [text deleted] which can accommodate the Appellant and the attendants who travel with him from Winnipeg; (e) the purchase of a second (and presumably fullyequipped) wheelchair for his use while in [text deleted]; and (f) the purchase and installation of other assistive devices for his residence in [text deleted]. |
| AC-04-13 | 2006/01/26 | 2006/02/16 | Whether the Appellant has provided a reasonable excuse for failing to apply for a review within the statutory sixty (60) day time limit |
| AC-04-99 | 2006/01/24 | 2006/02/09 | Entitlement to Income Replacement Indemnity benefits beyond May 23, 2003 |
| AC-05-25 | 2005/12/14 | 2006/02/09 | Entitlement to funding for athletic therapy treatment |
| AC-04-199 | 2005/11/23 | 2006/02/08 | 1. Whether Section 110(1)(a) was correctly invoked to end
the Appellant’s entitlement to Income Replacement
Indemnity effective January 15, 2004; 2. Whether the Appellant is entitled to Personal Injury Protection Plan funding for physiotherapy or chiropractic treatments, or medications, beyond February 19, 2004. |
| AC-04-115 | 2006/01/06 | 2006/02/06 | Determination of the amount of Income Replacement Indemnity payable to Mr. Boss for the period March 6, 2002 to June 18, 2004 |
| AC-03-177 | 2006/01/23 | 2006/02/01 | Entitlement to further chiropractic treatment benefits |
| AC-04-92 | 2005/11/17 & 2005/12/12 | 2006/01/24 | Whether the Appellant is capable of performing her pre-accident occupational duties as of June 24, 2003. |
| AC-03-57 | 2005/12/01 | 2006/01/24 | 1. Entitlement to chiropractic treatment benefits beyond
October 7, 2002; 2. Entitlement to reimbursement for costs incurred for massage therapy dispensed by a massage therapist; 3. Entitlement to permanent impairment award for leg length discrepancy as it relates to the Appellant’s soft tissue injuries. |
| AC-04-207 | 2005/10/31 | 2006/01/24 | Entitlement to reimbursement for travel expenses incurred while traveling to and from job placements. |
| AC-03-154 | 2005/11/15 & 2005/11/18 | 2006/01/20 | 1. Entitlement to further Permanent Impairment Benefits for reduction in hearing in right ear and vertigo; and 2. Entitlement to funding for physiotherapy care provided for vertigo. |
| AC-05-03 | 2005/10/17 & 2005/11/16 | 2006/01/19 | Entitlement to Income Replacement Indemnity benefits to compensate for time off work for the purpose of attending medical appointments or treatments arising from the motor vehicle accident |
| AC-04-24 | 2005/11/17 | 2006/01/18 | 1. Whether there is “new information” sufficient to permit the corporation to make a fresh decision”. 2. Whether, on the balance of probabilities, there is a causal relationship between the symptoms suffered by the Appellant and the motor vehicle accidents of October 13, 1994, March 31, 1995 and\or March 26, 1997 that would entitle her to reinstatement of her PIPP benefits. 3. Whether the Appellant qualifies for IRI benefits in relation to her absence from work in April 2000, and since August 2000 4. Whether the Appellant qualifies for PIPP benefits to cover, inter alia, reimbursement of the costs of a walker, cane, wrist supports, various kitchen devices and a bed. |
| AC-04-160 | 2005/12/06 | 2006/01/05 | Entitlement to Income Replacement Indemnity (‘IRI’) benefits as a result of the accident of October 27, 2003. |
| AC-05-111 | 2005/11/05 | 2006/01/05 | Entitlement to trigger point injections beyond August 30, 2004 |
