Table of Contents
LVAC: Index to Cases
| Appraisal Fees | See Consulting Costs; Appraisal Fees |
| Assessment | Esler |
| Burden of Proof | Anderson, 3 Rebel Holdings, Apr. /06, 10 |
| Certified Settlements | See Settlements |
| Claimant’s Time | Baranyk, 10 Dark Horse, 58-60 Demchenko, 124 Genstar (No. 2), 269-71 Gateway, 15 Glenlea 75 Servicentre Ltd. (No. 2) Green Gamble Taylor, 276-78 Gulak 29 L.C.R. 277-79 Hrynchuk Jen-Tek Ltd., June 17/82 Kennedy, 32 Klaus, 3 Leather Ranch (1985), 244-46 Marino, 6 Northwest, 279 and 286 Prophecy Management, 283-84 Rebel Holdings,89 L.C.R., 269-70 Saftiuk, 151-53 Stewart, 281-82 Zuchawich, 42 L.C.R. 319 Zuk, 39 |
| Commission Decisions: Generally | Bartmanovich, 3 |
| Consistency (See also Market Value: Same to Apply...) | Dorge, 136 Hall, 2 Joli, 317-18 Nolette, 79 Quiring, 105-06 Rosenthal, 181, 194 Sexsmith, 159 Unique Ents. Ltd. |
| Consulting Costs, Section 15(6): Generally | Gulak, 29 L.C.R. 271-73 Gulak, Mar. 31/82, 8, applying McDougall v. The Queen 19 L.C.R. Halprin, Jan. 26/81, 3, applying McDougall v. The Queen Jen-Tek Ltd. Oct. 25/82, 2, applying McDougall v. The Queen Lapointe |
| Consulting Costs, Section 15(6): Accounting Costs | BMP SoundTrac, 37 L.C.R. Core, 37 L.C.R. 79 Cosman’s (incl. statement about Comm.’s sympathy for the claimant) Fort Garry Holdings Saftiuk |
| Consulting Costs, Section 15(6): Appraisal Fees | Crossman et al, Dec. 22/82, 4 Jen-Tek Ltd., Oct. 25/82, 3 Kitson (No. 3) Kitson (No. 2) Lapointe Peters (No. 3) Stewart, 282 |
| Consulting Costs, Section 15(6): Engineering Costs, Overlap of Work Done | Gulak, 29 L.C.R, 264 |
| Consulting Costs, Section 15(6): Interest on Unpaid Consulting Costs | Gulak, 29 L.C.R., 264-65, 270 |
| Consulting Costs, Section 15(6): Interim Payments | Atkins & Reimer, 78 L.C.R. 155 |
| Consulting Costs, Section 15(6): Legal Fees | Ball Bosenko Core Inds. 29 L.C.R. 86 Core Inds. (No. 2), 37 L.C.R. Crossman et al Halprin, April 2/81 Hamilton & Cropo, Nov. 28/95 Jen-Tek Ltd., Oct. 25/82 Nichols (No. 2) Parkin Zuchawich, 43 L.C.R. 300 |
| Consulting Costs, Section 15(6): Legal Fees, Counsel Fee | Hull Publishing |
| Consulting Costs, Section 15(6): Using a Non-local Expert | Jen-Tek Ltd. Unreported, 1982, 6 Pirate Jan’s 35 L.C.R. 380 Skrypnyk, 10 |
| Consulting Costs, Section 15(6): Planner | Gulak, 29 L.C.R. 265, 270-71 |
| Consulting Costs, Section 15(6): Second Opinion Compensable | BMP Sound Trac, 3-4 Gulak? |
| Continuing Fixed Farming Costs | See Disturbance: Continuing Fixed Machinery Costs |
| Control Lines | See Highways Protection Act: Section 7(2) and Injurious Affection: Highways Protection Act Control Lines, Imposition of |
| Discounted Cash Flow Method | Pirate Jan’s, 35 L.C.R., goodwill value, 379 Vincent, market value |
| Disturbance: 28(1) Must Prove Out of Pocket Cost, Expense, Loss | Jackson Toronto Dominion Bank, 121 Zuk, 38 |
| Disturbance: Section 28(1)(a) Scope of Acres Included in Calculation | Rempel Skrypnyk, 8-9 |
| Disturbance: Section 28(1)(a) When Compensation is Payable Pursuant to Section 26(2)(b) | Esler, 71-72 |
| Disturbance: Section 28(1)(a) and (b) include Cost of Looking for but not Cost of Acquiring Relocation Premises | Cosman, 37 L.C.R. 249-50 |
| Disturbance: Section 28(1)(b) | Glenlea 75 Servicentre Ltd., 159 Uskikiw, 229-30 |
| Disturbance: Section 28(1)(c) Claim Submitted as a Section 15(6) or (7), formerly Section 28(1)(e), Claim Disallowed as Out of Time | Core Inds. (No. 2), 79-80 (drafting cost) Gulak, 266-67 |
| Disturbance: Section 28(1)(d) | Core Inds. 29 L.C.R. 87 |
| Disturbance: Section 28(2) | Bodner, 79 McLeod, 4 |
| Disturbance: Leaseholds, Section 28(3) | Christie McKay (Unreported) 3 Hovmand Joli, 7 Nabisco, 94-96 Sulipa, 151-53 |
| Disturbance: Section 29(1) | Fran-Rich Glenlea 75 Servicentre Ltd., 156 et seq. Happy Penny 35 L.C.R. 162-63 Higgins, 373 et seq. Kuklica,71 Mid-West Pirate Jan’s, 379-80 Tier |
| Disturbance: Section 29(1) “Mom and Pop” Business | Block, 5-6 and 8 Fidler, 292 Glenlea 75 Servicentre Ltd., 158 Gulak, Mar. 31/82, 7 |
| Disturbance: Section 29(2) | Cosman, 37 L.C.R. 252 |
| Disturbance: Actual Out-of-Pocket Costs etc. that have been or will be Incurred | Core Inds., 29 L.C.R. 68, 88 Palmer, 87 Rebel Holdings, Apr. /06, 1-2 |
| Disturbance Compensation: Additional Compensation to Replace Expropriated Land not Payable | Pearson, 192 |
| Disturbance: Advertising | RMK Enterprises, 268-69, 271 |
| Disturbance: Business Loss | BMP Sound Zuk, 37 |
| Disturbance: Business Loss: Post Expropriation When Owner Remains in Possession | Higgins, 375-76 J.Y. Invest., 93 Pirate Jan’s, 375-76 |
| Disturbance: Claimant’s Time | See Claimant’s Time |
| Disturbance: Claims for Fencing and Landscaping at New Residence Rejected | Macdonald, 2-3 |
| Disturbance: Cleaning up Expropriated Land not Compensable | Marino, 89 |
| Disturbance: Continuing Fixed Machinery Costs re Land Capable of the Redevelopment in the Long Term | Sexsmith, 159 |
| Disturbance: Continuing Fixed Machinery Costs, Generally | Berry (Nos. 1 and 2) Berry 45 L.C.R. Driedger (individualized, not equalized over a project) |
| Disturbance: Continuing Fixed Machinery Costs, Two expropriations from Same Owner | Berry, 45 L.C.R. 74 |
| Disturbance: Continuing Fixed Machinery Costs: Leased Land | Genoway (Nos. 1 and 2) Kennedy, 31 Smith Stoneacres Farm, 161 |
| Disturbance: Continuing Fixed Machinery Costs: Not Payable When Land not Worked for Three Years | Pearson, 192 |
| Disturbance: Cost to Attend Hearing, Section 15(6) | Gamey, 4 Rebel Holdings, 89 L.C.R., 273 Skrypnyk, 10 Smith, 5 |
| Disturbance: Cost of Renovating Relocation Premises not Compensable | Cosman’s, 37 L.C.R., 249-50 |
| Disturbance: Development Costs | Higgins Auto Body, 374 Inter-Struct Klaus Kreations Zuchawich 42 L.C.R., 319 |
| Disturbance: Employee Severance | Glenlea 75 Servicentre Ltd., 159 |
| Disturbance: Emotional Distress | Zuk, 18 |
| Disturbance; Fencing | Hrynchuk |
| Disturbance: Inconvenience During Construction Not Compensable | Hamilton & Cropo, July 19/85, 16 Lippoway, 2 Marino, 90-91 Palmer, 86-87 Thom (No. 2), 315 Zuk, 38 |
| Disturbance: Increased Tax and Utility Costs | Rebel Holdings, 89 L.C.R., 271-72 |
| Disturbance: Interim Bank Financing Cost | Genstar, 281 |
| Disturbance: “It is only just” | Berry, 45 L.C.R. 68 |
| Disturbance: Leaseholds | Christie McKay 48 L.C.R. (rent differential for renewal period) rev’d. by Man. C.A. Christie McKay (Unreported) (rent differential, leasehold improvements, stationery, moving, telephone, advertising, claimant’s time) Crystal Palace (sign, double rent, claimant’s time, advertising, stationery ,rent differential, leasehold improvements, interest on a chattel mortgage) Dark Horse 31 L.C.R. (business loss, claimant’s time, advertising, extra renovation, stationery, security system, personal property, business loss, signage, telephone, bank interest) Drake (market value, leasehold improvements, moving (but see Halprin & Ball, Jan. 26/81, 6), relocation, reinstatement, loss of income, consulting fees) Gateway (market value), 2, 8-9, 12-13 Genstar Green Gamble (rent differential, intercom, double rent, interim financing, stationery, advertising, claimant’s time, telephone) Halprin (market value) Jan. 26/81, 5 Happy Penny (market value of lease, leasehold improvements, redundant equipment, sign, goodwill) Kaplan (rent duplication, rent differential, moving, business loss during move, claimant’s time, consulting, telephone, business tax, advertising, stationery, leasehold improvements, signage, alarm system, interim financing, business loss at relocation site) Kuklica, 70 (goodwill) Leather Ranch 35 L.C.R. (leasehold improvements, double occupancy, moving, advertising, interim financing, rent differential) Leather Ranch (No. 2) (rent differential, interim financing) Pirate Jan’s 35 L.C.R. (goodwill, loss of profit, leasehold improvements) Prophecy (leasehold improvements, rent differential, moving, advertising, claimant’s time, business loss) Rubin’s (leasehold improvements, goodwill, rent differential, moving, claimant’s time) Saftiuk (advertising, claimants’ time, moving, professional fees, double rent, stationery, telephone, rent differential, leasehold improvements, insurance, business tax, maintenance, interim bank financing) Sulipa (rent differential, leasehold improvements, moving) Tier (leasehold improvements, redundant chattels, goodwill) |
| Disturbance: Leasehold Costs etc. not Subject to Frankel Steel | Crystal Palace, 94, double occupancy Green Gamble Taylor, additional rent, double occupancy, interim bank financing, inter-com. system Leather Ranch (No. 2), interim bank financing, 158 Saftiuk, 150 Christie McKay, Unreported/86, rent differential Genstar, 263 Halprin, Jan. 26/81, 6 |
| Disturbance: Leaseholds When Only Moving Costs, if any, Payble | Hovmand Joli, 320 |
| Disturbance: Leaseholds subject to Frankel Steel, as of When are Costs to be Frankelized? | Nabisco, 93-94 |
| Disturbance: Not payable for Improvements on Government Land | Kjear, 122 |
| Disturbance: Pre-expropriation Costs | Berry 45 L.C.R., 68 J.Y. Invests., 32 and 35 L.C.R. |
| Disturbance: Real Estate Commission Paid for Purchase of Relocation Site | Hilger Northwest Cycle, 286 |
| Disturbance: Relocation Costs During Construction | Zuk, 38 |
| Disturbance: Rent Differential During Renewal Period | Christie McKay, rev’d. by Man. C.A. |
| Disturbance: Valuation Date | Core 29 L.C.R. |
| Disturbance: Value of Goodwill and Redundant Chattels | Glenlea 75 Servicentre Ltd., 149 et seq. Higgins Auto Body, 4-5 Kuklica, 70-72 Pirate Jan’s |
| Easements | Acadia Bosenko Graham Sampson |
| Employee Transfers: Notice to the Government | Binkley v. Dept. of Housing, May 10/88 |
| Evidence: Adequacy of | Block, 6 and 8 Gateway, 15 |
| Evidence: Bare Assertion of a Claim not Sufficient | Miller, Unreported June/90, 3 |
| Evidence: Burden of Proof | Anderson, 3 Rebel Holdings, 89 L.C.R., 265-66 |
| Evidence: Fresh | Baranyk (No. 2) Dark Horse 31 L.C.R. Happy Penny June 26, 1984 and July 30, 1984, Q.B. and C.A. 32 L.C.R. Peters (No. 4), May 11/05 Rebel Holdings, 91 L.C.R. 316 |
| Evidence: Hearsay admissible if Source Identified | Kuklica, 68-69 Simeonidis, 130 |
| Evidence: Hearsay of Assessment | Esler |
| Evidence: Jurisdiction When not Wholly or Partly Satisfactory | Esler, 66 Hnatishin, 95 Polloway, 5 |
| Evidence: Number of expert witnesses | Kitson 29 L.C.R. 165 Thom (No. 2) 309-10 |
| Evidence: Offer to Purchase by Expropriating Authority Not Privileged | Kuklica, 68 |
| Evidence: Offers to Purchase Ignored | Loewen, 89 Medway, 94-96 Rampton, 52-53 |
| Evidence: Non-Expert Reading a Statement | Rubin’s Deli, 33 L.C.R. 203-04 |
| Evidence: Real Estate Agent | Probizanski, 319 |
| Evidence: Statutory Offer, Privilege | Genstar, 34 L.C.R. Malado, 3 |
| Evidence: Non-Statutory Offer Privilege | Medway, 93 |
| Evidence: Settlements | See Settlements |
| Evidence: Unopposed Expert Evidence | Peters |
| Evidence: Use of Hearsay in Appraisal Reports | Kuklica, 68-69 |
| Expropriation Act, definition of “Owner” | Gulak, Dec. 15/81 |
| Expropriation Act: Section 22(1) | Northwest Cycle, 288 |
| Expropriation Act: Section 26(2)(a) & (b) | See Market Value, Section 26(2)(a) & (b) |
| Expropriation Act: Section 27(2)(b) | Cosman Realty, 7-8 Baranyk, 4 Grimoffson, 3 Mercury, 183 |
| Expropriation Act: Section 28(2) | Block, 6-8 |
| Expropriation Act: Expropriating Authority can Pay More than The Exp. Act Requires | Prophecy Management, (1985) 34 L.C.R. 267, 275, 278-81 Nolette, 79 Unique |
| Farming Costs | See Disturbance: Continuing Fixed Machinery Costs |
| Fencing: Nominal for Fencing not Relocated | Marino, 90 Radics 1-2 |
| Fencing: Depreciation | Verrier |
| Goodwill: Valuation date | Pirate Jan’s, 33 L.C.R. |
| Highways Protection Act: Section 7(2) | Michaluk |
| Highways Protection Act: Section 16(2) | See Injurious Affection: Highways Protection Act Control Lines, Imposition of |
| Injurious Affection and Betterment must be Considered Together | Dorge, 137 Benjamin, 152 Dyck, 138-39 Ladoski, 261 Lecuyer, 238 Rosenthal, 195 Thom (No. 2), 312 Uskoski, 190 Zuk, 35 |
| Injurious Affection: Change in Control Line | See also Injurious Affection: Highways Protection Act Control Lines, Imposition of Carloni Demchenko, 124 |
| Injurious Affection: Change in Zoning | Demchenko, 123 |
| Injurious Affection: Construction Damage | Benjamin, 152 Zuk, 38 |
| Injurious Affection: For possible Future Imposition of a Control Line or Circle | Demchenko, 123 Uskiw, rev’d by C.A. |
| Injurious Affection: For possible Additional Traffic Lanes | Benjamin Dorge, 138 Rosenthal, 193 Zuk, 36 |
| Injurious Affection: Generally | Dorge, 135, 137 Rosenthal, 192 Zuk |
| Injurious Affection: “Guesses”, Which Commission will Make, If Necessary | Dorge, 137 Hnatishin, 95 Lecuyer, 238 Rosenthal, 195 Zuk, 34 |
| Injurious Affection: Highways Protection Act Control Lines, Imposition of, The Highways Protection Act, Section 16(2), The Expropriation Act, Section 25(2): | Demchenko, 123 Gillis Quarries Ltd. v. Dept. of Hwys. & Trans., July 24, 1995, 7-8, 10 Jackson |
| Injurious Affection: Loss of Shelterbelt from another parcel | Wiens, 4 |
| Injurious Affection: Resulting from a Median | Benjamin, 152 Hamilton & Cropo, July 19/95, 15 Rosenthal, 193 Zuk, 36 |
| Injurious Affection: Section 30(1)(a) | Hamilton & Cropo, July 19/95, 10-11, 14 Jackson Lecuyer, 238-39 McLeod, 7 Zuk, 34 |
| Injurious Affection: Section 30(1)(b) | Dorge, 136 Hamilton & Cropo, July 19/95, 10-11, 14 Jackson Kjear, 120 Lecuyer, 238-39 Palmer, 87 Stewart, 278-279 Zuk, 34-36 Dorge, 136 |
| Injurious Affection, Section 30(1)(c) | Hamilton & Cropo, July 19/95, 10-11, 15 Stewart, 7-9 Zuk, 36, 38 |
| Injurious Affection: Section 30(2) | Barre, 205 Hnatishin |
| Injurious Affection: Section 31(1) | Pirate Jan’s 35 L.C.R. 372-74 |
| Interest: Section 35(2) | Rockwood Vincent, 11 |
| Interest: Section 35(4) | Kennedy, Jan. 10/05, 6 |
| Interest on Unpaid Consulting Fees | Gulak v. Winnipeg (No 3) 29 L.C.R. 261, 270 Core Inds. (No. 2) 37 L.C.R. 73, 79 Atkins & Reimer (No. 3) |
| Jurisdiction: After Owner has Accepted and Received Payment of a Section 16 Offer | Rampton |
| Jurisdiction: Limited to Monetary Compensation | Saramaga, 2 |
| Jurisdiction: Not Limited to Evidence and Argument at Hearings; can Award Compensation Additional to What is Claimed | Leather Ranch 36 L.C.R. |
| Jurisdiction: To Allow Additional Subsequent Claims and to Suggest Additional Claims | Leather Ranch (No. 2) 155 Richill, 1 |
| Jurisdiction: To Certify after Quashing | J.Y. Invests., 36 L.C.R. |
| Jurisdiction: To Certify More Compensation than Required by The Expropriation Act | Nichols (No. 1), 302 |
| Jurisdiction: To Certify an Interim Payment of Appraisal Costs Incurred Before the Rest of the Due Compensation Payable is Determined | Thom (No. 1) |
| Jurisdiction: To Determine “Fair Compensation” Under The Land Acquisition Act | Atkins, 314-16 Hryhorczuk, 6-8 Peters Salvation Army Canada West |
| Jurisdiction: To Determine Disturbance Compensation Yet to be Incurred | See Disturbance: Actual Out-of-Pocket etc., That Have Been or Will be Incurred |
| Jurisdiction: When the Evidence of Neither Party’s Expert is Satisfactory in Whole or in Part | Berry, 45 L.C.R. 68 Esler, 66 Hnatishin, 95 Pollowoy, 5 |
| Legal Fees | See Consulting Costs, Legal Fees |
| Market Value: Section 26(2)(a) | Atkins Gottfried, 10-12 Klayh, 4 Reimer |
| Market Value: Section 26(2)(b) | Atkins Esler, 69-71 Reimer Simeonides, 130 |
| Market Value: Section 26(3) | F.G. Holdings Peters, re: date of determining claim Peters (No. 2), 29 Rockwood Samagalski, 2 |
| Market Value: Section 27(2)(a) | Jackson |
| Market Value: Section 27(2)(b) | Baranyk, 4 Cosman, 7-8 Grimolfson, 3 Mercury, 183 |
| Market Value: Section 27(2)(d) | Gottfried |
| Market Value: Section 27(4) | Andrejowich Barkman Brownridge Fidler, 290 Gamey Hashimoto Saramaga Stoneacres Farm, 160 |
| Market Value, Section 27(4) Within a City, Town or Village | Gamey Stewart, 272-273 Zuk, 3 |
| Market Value: Section 14(3) The Dept. of Hwys. & Trans. Act | Gottfried |
| Market Value: Agricultural Land, Income Method Not Used | Genoway, 2 Johnson, 187-88 Rachev, 2 Sala, 60 Venturelands Ltd. Wythe, 73-74 |
| Market Value: Assessment Evidence | Esler, 68-69 |
| Market Value: Comparable Sales Post Valuation Date | Pierce |
| Market Value: Comparable Sales, MHRC Sale | Wertendorf, 110 |
| Market Value: Comparable Sales Bank Foreclosure Sale can be a Reliable Indicator | Westendorf, 108-09 |
| Market Value: Determining Market Value by Cost of Purchasing and Renovation Relocation Premises | Cosman, 37 L.C.R. 247-49 |
| Market Value: Direct Comparison Method, Density Analysis | Qualico, 2-3 |
| Market Value: Discounted Cash Flow Method | Vincent |
| Market Value: Highest and Best Use, Significance of Master Plan | Kaminsky, 381 Royal Bank |
| Market Value: Highest and Best Use | McConnell, 76-77 |
| Market Value: Higher and Better Use Must be More than a Mere Chance | Carloni Cormier, 192 Hadaller, 150-51 Ladoski, 260 Nolette, 83 Sala, 61 Zuchawich, 318, 42 L.C.R. See also Special Adaptability Increment Awarded |
| Market Value: Improvements, Quantity Survey Method | Gulak, March 31/82, 6 |
| Market Value: Income Method | Abraham BMP Core 29 L.C.R. Johnston, 5 & 7 Klayh Northwest, 281 Rossen's, 4 Saftuik |
| Market Value and Injurious Affection, Section 27(3) or Discretely | Dorge, 136 Hamilton & Cropo, 12 Zuk, 36-37 Dorge, 136 |
| Market Value: Irrelevant Factors | Baranyk, 4, Section 27(2)(b) Cormier, 192, sentimental value Cosman Realty, 7-8, Section 27(2)(b) Edison, value to the owner, 213 Gimolfson, 3 Section 27(2)(b) Hilger, capital gains tax J.Y. Invests. 32 L.C.R., ins. proceeds Johnson, 224, sentimental or emotional attachment Klagh, value to the owner, 4-5 Klayh, 4-5, listing due to financial straits, value to the owner Ladoski, 259, forced nature of acquisition Ladoski, 260, sentimental value Mercury, 183, Section 27(2)(b) Nolette, 79, sentimental value Rampton, 57 forced-nature of the acquisition Rebel Holdings, 124, 127-29, owner as prospective purchaser Sala, cost of project, depressed land value, cost of expropriation Venturelands, price pd. for shares of the corporate owner of the land, 239-40 Wiens, 169, particular agricultural use to which land being put Wilpark, 133, sentimental value Wilpark, 132-33 farming practices |
| Market Value: Leasehold Interest | Drake Gateway Halprin Higgins Auto Body, 373 Baranyk, 6-7, adjustment for right of renewal |
| Market Value: List Price | Coutier, 7 Klayh, 4 Samagalski, 3 |
| Market Value: Listings | Mercury, 184-87 |
| Market Value: Owner Not To Be Treated as Prospective Purchaser | Rebel Holdings, 86 L.C.R., 124, 127-29 |
| Market Value: Purchase Price | BMP H.B. Invests. |
| Market Value: Same to Apply for all Similar Properties in a Project Acquired Under Either The L.A. Act or The Expropriation Act | Berry, 45 L.C.R., 65 Narfasson and Cherniak Nolette, 79, not extended to subsequent phases of a Project Skrypnyk, 7-8 Stoneacres Farm, 161 Wythe, 75 |
| Market Value: Special Adaptability Increment Awarded | Carloni Zuchawich 42 L.C.R. 318 See also Higher and Better Use Must be More than a Mere Chance |
| Market Value: Special Adaptability Value and Double Recovery | See Disturbance, s. 28(2) |
| Market Value: Statutory Offer Not Binding on Commission | Gottfried, 3, 9 |
| Market Value: Strip Acquisition Which Merely Moves Frontage Back | Andrejowich Tchir |
| Market Value: Subdivision Method | Grimolfson, Dec. 13/79, 4 Uskiw Vincent |
| Market Value: Sub-Surface Value | Bodner Gillis Quarries Ltd. v. Dept. of Hwys. & Trans., July 24, 1995, 14 et seq. |
| Market Value: Value to the Owner or Owner as a Propspective Purchaser Irrelevant | Edison, 213 Klayh Rebel Holdings, 86 L.C.R., 14, 127-29 |
| Market Value and Loss of Income or Increased Costs Claims Inconsistent | Michaluk, 158-59 |
| Mitigation | Dorge, 134 J.Y. Investments Ltd. v. Dept. of Hwys. (1986) 35 L.C.R. 12, 20 (Man. C.A.) J.Y. Investments Ltd. (No. 3), 90 Kjear, 122 Rosenthal, 13 |
| Owners of Proof | See Evidence: Burden of Proof |
| Profit Loss Caused by Expropriation | Zuchawich, 42 L.C.R. 319 |
| Reconsideration, See Evidence, Fresh | |
| Review, See Evidence, Fresh | |
| Settlements | Berry, 65-66 Jen-Tek Ltd., Unreported, June 17/82, 3-4 McConnell, 78-79 McLeod, 7 Pearson, 191 Quiring, 105 Smerchanski, 250-52 Wythe, 75 |
| Snow Clearing | Dorge Rosenthal, 194 Wilpark, 143 |
| Special Economic Advantage: Section 26(1)(d) | Block, 9 Drake Edison, 213, 217-18 (the Maretski ppty. described at 215 is probably a good example of special economic advantage) Gateway, 14 Genstar, 281 Gillis Quarries Ltd. v. Min. of Hwys. & Trans., July 24, 1995, 13 Glenlea 75 Servicentre Laiterie Hogue, Jan 8/2008 Rebel Holdings, 89 L.C.R., 258 Simeonides, 127, 129 Vincent Bros. |
| Statutory Offer: Privilege | Genstar 34 L.C.R |
| Travel Cost: To Attend Hearing | See Disturbance: Cost to Attend Hearing |
| Travel Cost: To Consult Lawyer | Zuk, 19 See also Consulting Costs: Using a Non-Local Expert |
| Travel, Extra: Generally: Disturbance or Injurious Affection | Berry, 45 L.C.R 70, 72 Winpark 138-43 |
| Tree Shrub, Shelter Compensation: Discounting Equipment Purchased to Maintain Replacement trees etc. | Doolan, 62 Stewart, 9 |
| Tree, Shrub, Shelter Compensation, Generally | Palmer, 84-85 Hadaller, 151-52 Herda Hrynchuk Kapelus Lecuyer, 239-40 Martin Stewart, 9 Uskoski Wiens, Feb. 19/80 Wilpark, 134-36 |
| Tree Shrub Shelter Compensation: Landscaping Improvement | Marino, 6 Stewart, 9 |
| Trees, Loss of Not Compensable | McLeod, 3 |
| Value to the Owner | Edison, 213 Klayh, 4-5 Laiterie Hogue |
| Varying Certificate, see Evidence, Fresh | |
| Waste: Section 22 | Northwest, 288 |
